Docentes

Fabrizio Macagno

:
Ciências da Comunicação
:
Professor Auxiliar Convidado
:

Contactos

:
401

Idiomas de Ensino

Inglês

Italiano

Português

Páginas online

Redes Profissionais e de Investigação

Áreas de Investigação

  • Argumentation
  • Pragmatics
  • Logic
  • Philosophy of law
  • Education
:
argumentation theory, argumentation schemes, interpretation, inferences, implicatures, dialectics,

Projectos de Investigação

  • Argumentation, Communication, and Context – PTDC/FIL-FIL/110117/2009;
  • Values in Argumentative Discourse - PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014

Publicações Relevantes

  • Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2016). A Classification System for Argumentation Schemes. Argument and Computation.
  • Walton, D., Sartor, G., & Macagno, F. (2016). An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 24, 1: 51-91.
  • Mayweg-Paus, E., Macagno, F. & Kuhn, D. (2015). Developing argumentation strategies in electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective? Discourse Processes. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1040323
  • Macagno, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Kuhn, D. (2015). Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies. Topoi 34:523–537
  • Macagno, F., & Douglas, W. (2015). Classifying the patterns of natural arguments. Philosophy & Rhetoric 48(1): 26-53
  • Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2015). The Importance and Trickiness of Definition Strategies in Legal and Political Argumentation. Journal of Politics and Law 8(1): 137-148
  • Macagno, F., Walton, D., & Tindale, C. W. (2014). Analogical Reasoning and Semantic Rules of Inference. Revue internationale de philosophie 270(4): 419-432
  • Macagno, F. & Zavatta, B. (2014). Reconstructing metaphorical meaning. Argumentation 28(4): 453-488
  • Macagno, F. (2014). Manipulating emotions. Value-based reasoning and emotive language. Argumentation and Advocacy 51: 103-122
  • Macagno, F. (2013). Strategies of character attack. Argumentation 27(4): 369-401.
  • Macagno, F. & Damele. G. (2013). The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises: Presumptions in Enthymemes. Informal Logic 33 (3): 365-393
  • Konstantinidou, K. & Macagno, F. (2013) Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education. Science and Education 22(5): 1069-1087
  • Macagno, F. & Konstantinidou, K (2013). What students’ arguments can tell us. Using argumentation schemes in science education. Argumentation 27(3): 225-243
  • Macagno, F. & Puppo, F. (2013). Argomentare in processo. Il "ragionamento per dicotomie" nella strategia difensiva. Cultura e diritti 2: 47-59
  • Macagno, F. (2013). The acts and strategies of defining. In G. Kišiček and I. Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do We Know about the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives (pp. 63-78). Windsor (ON): Windsor studies in argumentation.
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2013). Implicatures as Forms of Argument. In A. Capone et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy (pp. 203-224). Berlin/New York: Springer.
  • Macagno, F. & Puppo, F. (2013). Il ragionamento per dicotomie nella strategia difensiva. Cultura e diritti 3: 63-73
  • Macagno, F. (2012). Gli usi argomentativi del linguaggio emotivo. Sistemi intelligenti 24 (3): 433-454
  • Macagno, F. (2012). Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions. Argumentation 26 (2): 233-265.
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2012). Character Attacks as Complex Strategies of Legal Argumentation. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 2 (3): 1-58
  • Macagno, F. (2012). Classifying the Properties of Life Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 29(4): 627-629
  • Macagno F (2012). Reconstructing and assessing the conditions of meaningfulness. An argumentative approach to presupposition. In H. Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation (pp. 247-268). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2012). Presumptions in legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 25 (3): 271–300
  • Macagno, F. (2011). The presumptions of meaning. Hamblin and equivocation. Informal Logic 31 (4): 367-393
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2011). Reasoning from Paradigms and Negative Evidence. Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (1): 92-116
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2011). Quotations and Presumptions - Dialogical Effects of Misquotations. Informal Logic 31 (1): 27-55
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2010). What we hide in words: emotive words and persuasive definitions. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1997-2013.
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2010). Ragionare Per Dicotomie - Struttura Argomentativa e Usi nel Common Law. Ars Interpretandi 15: 167-187
  • Walton, D. & Macagno, F. (2010). Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions. Informal Logic 30: 34-61
  • Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2010). The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 1: 1-37
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2010). Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments. Argumentation 24, 3: 283-317
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2010). Dichotomies and Oppositions in Legal Argumentation. Ratio Juris 23: 229-257.
  • Macagno F., (2010). Definitions in law. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 2: 199-217
  • Macagno F (2010). Dialectical and heuristic arguments: presumptions and burden of proof. In C. Reed and C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument. London: College Publications.
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2009). Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories. Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2): 154-182
  • Macagno F. (2009). The Dialectical-Dialogical Definition. L'analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI Special Issue 1: 443-461
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2009). Reasoning from Classification and Definition. Argumentation 23: 81-107
  • Walton D., Macagno F. (2009). Enthymemes, Argumentation Schemes, and Topics. Logique et Analyse 205: 39-56
  • Walton D., Macagno F. (2009). Classification and Ambiguity: the Role of Definition in a Conceptual System. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29): 1-20
  • Macagno F., Walton, D. (2008). The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11(5): 525-549
  • Macagno, F., Walton, D. (2008). Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements. Informal Logic 28(3): 203-228
  • Macagno F. (2008). Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory. Informal Logic 28 (2): 102-128
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2007). Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Relevance, and Textual Congruity. Anthropology & Philosophy 8 (1-2): 101-121
  • Macagno F., Walton D., Reed C. (2007). Argument Diagramming in Logic, Artificial Intelligence, and Law. Knowledge Engineering Review 22 (1): 87-109
  • Macagno F., Walton D. (2007). The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum. Argumentation 28(3): 203-228
  • Rowe G., Macagno F., Walton D., Reed C., (2006). Araucaria as a Tool for Diagramming Arguments in Teaching and Studying Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 29 (2): 111-124
  • Macagno F, Walton D. (2005). Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence. International Commentary on Evidence 3/1: 1-42
  • Macagno F, Walton D. (2005) Common Knowledge and Argumentation Schemes. Studies in Communication Sciences 5/2: 1-22

Formação

Ano Grau Área Instituição Classificação
2008
Doutor
Linguistics and Communication
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
2004
Mestre
Arts and Philosophy
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Experiência Profissional Relevante

  • 2014. Universidade Nova de Lisboa – Instituto de Filosofia da Linguagem Research fellow (Investigador FCT). Field of investigation: Argumentation theory and science education.
  • September-December 2012 Teachers College at Columbia University Visiting Scholar: Research under the supervision of Prof. Deanna Kuhn on dialectical strategies in education.
  • September 2010 – December 2013 Universidade Nova de Lisboa – Instituto de Filosofia da Linguagem Post-doc researcher. Field of investigation: Argumentation theory and pragmatics
  • September 2011 - present Universidade Nova de Lisboa – FCSH Professor Auxiliar: Course: Estratégias Argumentativas (MA in Strategic communication)
  • July 2012. Universidade Nova de Lisboa – FCSH Estratégias discursivas de persuasão. Escola de Verão

A atualização dos dados é da responsabilidade do respetivo docente e poderá ser feita na intranet.